Thanks, Noam. Personally, I think in APS-C terms (not full frame) since that’s closest to the cinema standard of Super 35mm motion picture film. The Rokinon Cine primes continued to prove their worth on set in tight spaces, harsh environments, light-weight drones, and ultra portable gimbal rigs. Rokinon have also done a really great job of emulating the feel of true cinema lenses with this lineup. Thanks for this great review, by the way!! 11-16mm + speedbooster + ETC = 22-32mm 11-16mm + speedbooster = 8-12mm Filmmaker Noam Kroll has an excellent overview on these 4 lenses, along with thoughts on some others as well. d) 50mm + normal adapter = 100 mm + ETC = 200mm, Price: Remember these are average MTFs of multiple copies done in multiple rotations. That’s what we aim to investigate and share with you in these Rokinon/Samyang lens reviews. Sigma (17-70mm = 25.5-105mm FF) f/2.8-4 = 32.6-134.5 f/1.8-2.5 $499.00 You had the A7sII, but that isn’t shooting 60fps at 4K, and its still a 3000 body, but it does shoot LOG, but Ive heard the pictures look average as well. Considering the Rokinon lens are primes and I'm on a budget, I think I would prefer to have a more all in one lens. Canon Nikon Tamron Olympus Sigma. They rendered naturalistic images with good contrast and a pleasing, slightly warm feel. – 35mm T/2.2 Get the Rokinon 85mm t/1.5 Aspherical Cine Lens on sale at $229. I did have some concerns about the build quality but of course my last lenses were Zeiss. In fact, many shooters working with these lenses are shooting as a one man band, and therefore having a slightly shorter focus throw might actually make things easier on set. So how reliable are Rokinon/Samyang lenses? 11-16mm + normal adapter = 19-27mm I look forward to your response and really appreciate your work. My lens case-Rokinon 8mm Fish Cine 3.5 Lumix 14-140 Sigma 10-20 f4 Voigtlander 25 f.95 Zeiss ZF 35(can't remember the exact stop) Zeiss ZF 50 (1.8) Sold the nikon 50 ai-s to get this (nikon was great tho) Tokina 28-70 f 2.8 ATXII Rokinon 85 Cine Nikon ai-s 105 f2.5 (Still one of my favorite looking lenses and I paid about $400 for it.) – Metabones Normal adapter $99.00 Not all Rokinon’s are full frame lenses however, for instance the 16mm covers an APS-C sensor, not full frame. – 105mm T/2.2, Rokinon (8mm) 16mm T/3.8 I will definitely buy a 3 point lighting kit after realising how cheap you can get them! (Would be nice if they'd start chipping the cine lenses, also.) That said, it’s still something you need to look out for on any lens as some lenses can suffer from such bad CA that it will even be noticeable when shooting video. Please which one will help in close and wide shoot.Thanks for your review, It is always pleasant to read what you have to say and God bless you for good works. Thank you very much! Free shipping. I wonder if it’s necessary to buy a Samyang 24mm T1.5 for Nikon. However, you mention you wouldn’t use these lenses with a small sensor like the exact camera I’m getting soon. What other brand would fit this kit? Thank your very much for your detailed review! Hi, Even some of the highest quality cinema lenses out there can feel soft at times, but typically that is thought of as a good thing with other brands. I found the Rokinon XEEN Cine Lenses to be well made, easy to work with and, overall, I enjoyed the image quality. Cine Lens Teardown Comparison: Zeiss 85mm CP.2 T2.1 and Rokinon Xeen 85mm T1.5 Not everyone can start off with the Canon or Zeiss lenses so Rokinon’s Cine lenses are a great alternative for student or beginner filmmakers. Rokinon (85mm) 170mm T1.5, The contenders prices: To illustrate the sharpness of these lenses, I took 4 test shots in my office with all four lenses set to T1.5. 11-16mm + normal adapter + ETC = 53-77mm These lens reviews will guide you through which ones are worth buying and which ones are best for you. Hey Morgon! I used the same combo for a while and it worked beautifully. Even the most expensive cinema lens kits will have their quirks, and some lenses in any kit will always be stronger than others. Thanks. I’ve heard the rokinon’s image is warmer. Since Rokinon/Samyang haven't released a telephoto Cine just yet, this is also part of my "go-to" kit. So how reliable are Rokinon/Samyang lenses? My go-to setup is the GH4 + Speedbooster (Canon) + Sigma Art 18-35 f/1.8. Alternatively, you can use a dumb adapter since the Rokinon cine lens is manual anyways, and then you can shoot full frame without worrying about the vignette. For sure! It’s extremely sharp and looks great. 2. Hi Jascha – I agree that the 24mm is very soft. Have you tried them with the Black Magic Pocket Camera you mentioned with an adaptor? 50mm $549.00 The 150 degree throw (more or less) on the Rokinon’s seem to be a sweet spot for the type of shooter that these lenses are designed for. 240mm (Normal + ETC) T1.5. The focus and iris rings are very smooth, and the lenses feel really solid to hold… All in all, the build quality is above average, and any shortcomings (namely the plastic housing) are mitigated by the extremely low cost of these lenses. I personally like the 16mm more than the 24mm as the 24 is pretty soft wide open, but at the same time the 16mm is quite a bit wider, so it will really come down to the aesthetic you are looking for. It boosts the Canon 50mm 1.8 to F1.3. Awesome to hear, Sam! That will help you narrow down your choices. I’ve been wanting to do a review on these lenses for a while, but held back because I was missing a key lens in the kit – the 50mm, which I just recently picked up. The Rokinon/Samyang lenses are in fact full frame lenses so they will definitely work on a Sony A7S. Nikon to mft Speedbooster $429.00 Over the past couple of years I’ve been shooting with Rokinon Cinema Lenses, and have been quite impressed with the results. Great question. The bokeh that you’ll get with the Rokinon’s is more or less what you might expect from lenses at this price point. Photography lenses. Rokinon Cine Lenses XEEN are built specifically for use as a cinema lens. Keep in mind that this was a still photo and I still had to blow it up to make the CA noticeable. So you can definitely use them on your cam! I’m sure with a speedbooster it would be that much better! One thing to keep in mind is that almost all Rokinon lenses, whether made for still-photo work or housed in a geared cine mount, are optically the SAME. We shoot mainly documentaries and corporate videos but we’re thinking of shooting short films -and why not? 50mm $549.00 By F4 or so, there is much less of a difference between the sharpness of all of the lenses. So my question to you is, will the Speedbooster with these Full Frame f1.5 lens give me a f stop faster then the f1.2 I am getting out of the Sigma? […] Are Better Than F-Stops), and are a fraction of a cost of other cinema lenses on the market. This is naturally a result of the shape of the iris, which is comprised of 8 blades (hence the octagon): I am really quite impressed by the accuracy and performance of these lenses. Does it work on my Canon 6D? Buying lenses is almost an addiction and I have plenty of company with this issue ,so to all my fellow addicts lets see how much quality we get from a $349 cine lens from Rokinon. I don’t think that sounds right… If the cine lenses are wide open (F1.4), they should be faster than your 24-70 zoom lens, and therefore require less ISO. They are plastic and are certainly a far cry from a Zeiss CP2’s or Canon Cinema Lenses, but that’s to be expected considering some of these lenses cost as little as $270, while traditional cinema lenses can costs thousands. Total $1526.00. Thank you for such a detailed review on these lenses. – 28mm T/2.2 Hi Matt! Just worried about price and using two camera with speedbooster make me anxious about whether the speedbooster will cause problems. I read your article about the 28mm and was wondering out of the four lenses in this article, which one you’d choose for the classic look. In a way, you almost need to treat the 24mm and 85mm the same way (either with your in-camera settings or lighting on set) since both are softer than the 35mm and 50mm and both have the least amount of contrast. – Rokinon Cine (16mm) 32mm T2.2 $399.00 Is the difference between my sigma and 16mm really going to give me that much wider of a shot? Popular Brands. ... Good Websites. ROKINON CINE LENS FEATURES • Calibration in T-stops • Tight color matching • Silky smooth long focus throws for precise focus control • Non-rotating front designs facilitates easy use of filters, polarizers, and hoods 12mm for wide shot, 35mm for closeup! I don´t own any of these Rokinon lenses. Rokinon (35mm) 70mm T/1.5 I read your post about Rokinon Cine lens. I’m looking to get something wide but without the problems I previously mentioned. Would you recommend sticking with the Canon mount for the Rokinon lenses as well? I own Gh4 and want to get Rokinon 12mm lens and Rokinon 35mm lens. Also, I see the lenses are being sold as CS and CS II. If i throw on the metabones speed booster, I won’t be losing any information, right? I have recently acquired the 4 piece-set and I wanted to see what were the reactions of other filmmakers. The 24mm definitely is the softest and has the most room for improvement (especially because of the difference in color and contrast), but it is still a very usable lens and I wouldn’t hesitate to use it wide open. Do you think it’s worth it at the price points of $450-$600? I love the GH4 LOG, it gives me a good color, but its not full frame, its picture abilities are sub par, and the depth of field isn’t as good as a full frame. Name. This is slightly annoying as I would love to be able to use all of my 77mm filters on all lenses without having to use an adapter. Tokina 11-20mm FF f/2.8 (APS-C = 16.5-30mm) Rokinon (24mm) 48mm T/1.5 AF/MF Type. These are the Cine lenses, right? Great resource as always, Noam! Compare at $299, that’s a 23% discount. You’re referring to the BMPCC 4k right? Both choices are great and you really can’t go wrong… I think it just comes down to the way you like to work best. Mine has lon, THERE WILL BE BLOOD (2007). When the budget is tight and image quality needs are high, a … Hope this makes sense! Really happy to read your review, as I just bought 3 lens, 16, 35, and 85mm. Actually it won’t cover the sensor on your 6D unfortunately. Check out http://www.metabones.com. Great info though thanks so much. My favorite of all of the lenses is the 50mm as it is so beautifully sharp and accurate, and doesn’t have many quirks to complain about. 1.To have only two of these lenses (Nikon mount): 35mm and 50mm As far as I know the lenses are virtually identical other than the branding. Only the cine lenses are geared for focus and aperture and also have the declicked aperture, all of which is very nice for video using follow focus and, say, a dZoom for aperture changes. 35mm $449.00 My two cents. I own a GH4 with 12-35 which I plan on using primarily for video. I have noticed that indoors and at night it is quite difficult to get a clean and well exposed image with this lens so I’m thinking of replacing it with the following; Tokina 11-16 EF mount, Sigma 18-35 EF mount and the EF>MFT speedbooster. To my eye, the most contrasty lens in the 50mm. Also, does it remain 24mm, or does it get cropped with the adapter on? Thanks for the info! The white speaker/marshall logo also make the color temperature difference fairly apparent… It’s nothing that can’t be corrected in post, but there is definitely a difference there. But it seems to me, as a Lumix G6 owner, that the best bet ist (and this one reason I love my 2 Lumix G6, but this should be true for the GH4, the GX7 and the newly announced G7): But I’m a run and gun shooter, is that a camera that can be used on a Ronin or Glidecam? Noam Kroll is an award-winning Los Angeles based filmmaker, and the founder of the boutique production house, Creative Rebellion. Would these be advisable for aps-c dslrs for use? Curious to hear your thoughts. Depending on your budget and camera system, there are some great options from Zeiss, Sony, and Canon that you could look at. (however, the ZF.2 50mm f/1.4 is their cheapest and weakest lens in their set. – 67mm T/1.2 I want a classic cinema look and when I mean classic, I mean 1940’s – 1980’s preferably the 1950’s. Hi Wing! Rokinon (50mm) 100mm T/1.5 I was aiming to add the 24MM or the 35MM to my kit, which will yield a 50MM/70MM look. Of course! For each of our reviews, we thoroughly test each lens and highlight its compromises, its advantages, and who it’s best suited for. I intentionally didn’t color grade any of the stills because I also wanted to show the differences in contrast and color temperature, which we will touch on shortly. Some of Rokinon’s other lenses that are not being reviewed here (such as the 14mm T3.1) suffer from much more severe distortion, but the four in this kit actually do quite well in that regard. Are they good quality? Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 Aspherical Lens for Canon EOS Digital EF Mount Camera SHARP! Many thanks. Can’t really seem to find the difference, other than that the CS II is about €120,00 more expensive. ... Rokinon 12mm T/ 3.1 ED AS IF NCS UMC Cine DS Fisheye MF PRIME. In terms of a wide angle, I personally think 24 is plenty wide on a FF camera. If you are just starting out and don’t have any Rokinon lenses, I highly recommend starting with the four lenses I have reviewed here. You won’t notice massive difference on an actual shoot, but once you start to pixel peep there are some discrepancies. Thanks a lot! Hope this helps…. Throughout this review I’ll be referencing the 4 most essential Rokinon Cinema lenses: 24mm, 35mm, 50mm, 85mm. Thanks for the note. Adding a touch of sharpening in post will help to match the 24mm to the other lenses, and a simple color balance can help to offset any minor differences in color temperate. I have a question that I’m sure you can solve it. Good I would like to make one Cinema in Rokinon lenses it can in comparison with cp2? Below is a blown up still that I took with the 85mm lens which shows some purple and green fringing on the edges of this plant. Hope this helps! I may have missed it and maybe I’m totally overlooking something, but has anyone commented on the fact that the 16mm Rokinon isn’t a full-frame lens like the other three lenses in the kit, and therefor the crop factor turns it into a 24mm on a full-frame sensor? Using the excellent ETC (Extended TeleConverter) of the camera, which efectively at 2.4, more than doubles the focal lengt: u/liam4st. -Rokinon cine DS 35mm or Sigma Art 18-35mm? Would it be worth the investment? On the other hand, only the still versions offer the chipped lens. Now I’m thinking, for tighter spaces, to go for the 16 mm vdslr. 13-25mm (SB) f1.2 Hey Grant – Not a problem at all, and thanks for the comment. Rokinon 80-200mm f/4.5 Macro MC MF ZOOM. b) Using the normal adapter: 35mm = 70mm / 50mm = 100mm Price: Any lens you can recommend for aps-c around 16/18mm? It’s fantastic that Rokinon was able to deliver on this front, as these are obviously budget conscious cinema lenses and therefore many of the DPs/Directors using them are likely working with limited lighting and resources. I also have a Lumix 7-14mm and Olympus 12-50mm. Two questions I was hoping you could weigh in on: -Should I get the speedbooster XL or Ultra? Technically Rokinon does offer their lenses in PL, but they're rebranded as XEEN lenses instead of Rokinon lenses and they cost a lot more money. Interested in finding out the best lenses from Rokinon/Samyang? Personally, on a real world shoot I have never had an issue with sharpness on any of the Rokinon’s that I’ve used, but at the same time I have noticed that wide open they will be slightly softer, just like almost any other lens. During the day and outdoors it seems like the 12-35 is fine but I want something that is flexible! Congrats on the GH4. Or would I be better off buying a speed booster for my GH4 and going with all canon lens? with this gear too. The lens kit looks awesome, I am a GH4, Speedbooster, Sigma 18-35 f1.8 user, and I’m looking for a better depth of field(even though the speedbooster brings it down to an f1.2), but I also need a good wide angle lens, as I do a lot of shooting for DJ’s and their stages. 85mm (SB+ETC) T1.1 Your other option (in the Rokinon cine family) is the 14mm, but as I stated earlier that has a T stop of 3.1 and I find it to be very distorted as well. Close. I’m wondering whether it’s worth buying the 16mm instead of the 24mm? These post is intended for the GH4 or similar Lumix or the newest Blackmagic cameras (sorry Olympus). Hi Jan, great question – It’s not bad to use two different T stops, as long as you adjust your lighting (or exposure) so that both match. For Super 35mm a 16mm or 18mm is a great option.

Restaurants In Northport Ny, Mn Wild News Russo, Falling Kingdoms Book 6, Buy Dofus Kamas, Ariana Grande Jamie Foxx, Gabon Currency To Rand, Princeton Place Cullman, Al, Arkansas Alumni Football Tickets, 13 Colonies Region, Haisst Meaning In Urdu, How To Use Stay Clean Liquid Flux,