If the Super Speeds are siblings to the Contax line, the Zeiss Classic (ZE and ZF.2) would be their descendants. Zeiss esteemed collection of prime lenses designed for photography with motion picture in mind are an ideal solution for the cinematographer looking to shed the size, weight, and price of a higher-end prime lens. I’m sure the naming was an attempt to carry on their cinema lens series like the Ultra Primes, Digi Primes, and of course the Master Primes. The true benefit to the CP.2s is the mechanical build quality and construction. thanks! If it breathes the same, both are fast, what are the real, if any down sides for getting duclos modded zf speed set vs a cp2 super speed set for three plus times the price? The focus scales on the CP.2 have far more marks that are spaced nicely and very easy to read with precise witness marks for each distance. Thank you for this article! I rate it cosmetically a (10-). For example, the 50mm ZF.2 tops out at f/1.4, a commendable aperture. This means that you’ll have to work a little harder to get that nice creamy bokeh to really melt in the background. The mount is swapped by removing a few screws from the mount, shimming, and replacing with the desired mount. How do the ZF lenses compare to the Zeiss Pentax primes? Condition:--not specified This Zeiss 55mm f1.4 Otus ZF.2 Lens, #51515095, is in excellent condition with only faint handling wear. There are plenty of follow focus units on the market with a flip-flop gear box that will allow you to reverse the direction of your follow focus, essentially “correcting” the focus rotation of a ZF.2. Zeiss 18mm F3.5 (T3.5) ZF Distagon SLR prime wide angle lens Nikon mount. There would be very, very minor optical differences mostly due to the shape of the aperture blades, more rounded at all stops in the CP.2s. Zeiss 25mm Super Speed MkII with the Sony FS7. But what makes the Compact Primes so much more expensive than, say, a Zeiss ZF.2? Description. One question remained for me though, lens breathing for CP2 vs ZF2, any difference? Zeiss released their CP.2 (Compact Primes) cinema lenses about a year ago, not long after they dropped their original Compact Primes on the market. These lenses are incredibly sharp and fast. Either route is going to produce excellent results just as any Zeiss lens should. The Zeiss primes (at least) will offer me quality and hopefully cope well with any megapixel camera of the future. Los número F por el contraría son solo una estimación matemática de la cantidad de luz que atravesará el objetivo. This isn’t a deal breaker considering some shooters these days have become accustomed to quicker, shorter focused pulls on still lenses but there is no denying the expanded focus throw of the Compact Primes is far more accurate. Buy ZEISS 135mm f/2 Apo Sonnar T* ZF.2 Lens for Nikon F Mount featuring 135mm Telephoto Prime Lens, Fits Nikon F Mount Cameras, Aperture Range: f/2-22, Minimum Focus Distance of 2.62' (0.8 m), … If you don’t mind listing which ZF’s pull further and are more like CP2’s, that would be great! Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window), Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window), Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window), Matthew Duclos’ Circle of Confusion: Zeiss CP.2 vs. ZF.2 | Kelly On A Tangent, A Roundup of Lens Options for the New Breed of Super35 Camcorders - NoFilmSchool, Lens Options : Scarlet Edition « Matthew Duclos' Circle of Confusion, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xapiFu5xcXI. The difference between f/stop and T stop is the same from lens to lens in this case. View Full Version : Zeiss ZF/compact primes vs. Standards. With 35mm Full Frame coverage, available exclusively in Sony E mount, the Loxia primes are an excellent choice for pairing with ultra high resolution Sony mirrorless cameras. The Classic ZF.2 lenses from ZEISS have enjoyed an outstanding reputation with photographers and cinematographers all over the world for many years now – and rightly so. There has been a lot of debate about the value of the Compact Primes. Is there any difference between the back focus (I’ve read your article about it Got the general idea) between the two as I know the ZF.2 would be equipped with a adaptor, or is it already properly shimmed (if that s the proper world for it). I’d like to note that this should be done by a technician with test equipment to ensure flange focal distance is set properly. The Compact Primes vary in weight a little bit because of the different optical designs and quantity/size of glass elements but their diameter and length are all standardized except for the two close focus 50mm and 100mm lenses. Carl Zeiss Planar 50 mm f0.7 Lens (Modifie... < 1 > Carl Zeiss Planar 50mm with Kollmorgen Ada... < 1 > Zeiss Compact Prime Lenses < 14 > Zeiss DigiPrime Lenses < 21 > Zeiss Jena Lens < 2 > Zeiss Supreme Prime Series Lenses < 2 > Zeiss ZE Prime Lenses < 6 > Zeiss ZF.2 Prime Lenses < 1 > Zeiss … Among them the well-known ZEISS Compact Prime family, the ZEISS Cinema Zooms and of course the ZEISS Supreme Primes … The next item is the aperture. Thanks for the article as always Matthew, really appreciate your professionalism, and I finally made up my mind as I’m going with the ZF.2 for various reasons including budget, have a few question regarding usability with the canon DSLR crop sensor. It is very helpful. Top three 50mm / 55mm primes … A classic design inherited and evolved over the past few decades, the Zeiss Classic primes offer manual focus in a anodized aluminum body. The Zeiss Distagon 28mm f/2 produces a moderate degree (~1.8%) of barrel distortion. The ZF.2s being the still photo lenses they are, use a spring loaded iris with clicks at every third stop increment. Details about Zeiss 21mm ZF.2 f/2.8 Prime Lens. They just happen to make very pretty images when mounted to a motion picture camera as well as a still photo camera. May 29, 2019 at 03:38 AM However, a lot of cinematographers are opting for the ultra budget conscious still photo lenses with Cine-Mods to bring them up to cinema spec. A quick side note, there is a very obvious naming difference for the ZE and ZF lenses Z=Zeiss, E=Canon EF, and F=Nikon F, simple. I have some questions, with a Nikon to Arri standard adapter on an Arriflex 16s, how a Zeiss zf2 (nikon mount) performs against a Zeiss standard speed or ultra speed on Arri mount? Sort of… There are quite a few features that really separate the two lenses no matter how similar their heritage is. Zeiss' foray into the world of auto-focus, the Batis prime lenses feature a composite resin body which provide an ultra light, yet durable design. And yes, its hard to build a set, as some of the rare gems are halla expensive. 08-07-2008, 07:32 AM. Item Information. Each lens is more suitable for a range off needs. For example, the f/2.0 lenses are equal to a T2.1. This is handy when swapping lenses during a shoot since you don’t have to think about repositioning your follow focus or motors. Many of the Contax primes still outresolve many other primes. Unfortunately the breathing is identical between the ZF.2 and CP.2 as they both come from the same optical design. I can’t attest to this as I haven’t seen any difference in the glass or the test results produced by the Compact Primes, but it looks good on a brochure. I have 7 ZEISS ZF.2 primes (2 Otus & 5 Milvus) and they all work perfectly on the Z6 & Z7. The Compact Primes take it a step beyond pretty images and provide a professional set of features that can be very valuable to a cinematographer and his/her crew. March 8th, 2011, 08:54 PM. Sure the ZF.2 lenses are smaller, lighter, and overall more portable than the Compact Primes. Renowned Carl Zeiss contrast and resolution brings out the best in α7 series full frame E-mount bodies. Love the CPs, they are my lense of choice for work on my C300. Nils J. Nesse. The focus movement of both lens series is superb. A rounder aperture makes for rounder bokeh, smoother background blur at wider apertures. Leonard Levy. This can be a plus or minus depending on how you are looking at it. Thank you for this writeup. the Zeiss CP2 blow the ZE away. ARRI/Zeiss Ultra Prime Lenses have the widest focal range of prime lenses giving you the flexibility to get the coverage you want. Next up is the lens mount. Hello all! I too would like to know if there is any difference between CP2 and ZF2 with regards to focus breathing. Speaking of gears, yeah, the Compact Primes come equipped with cine-standard 32-pitch gears where the ZF.2 lenses sport a knurled grip instead. The ZF.2 housings vary from lens to lens just like their aperture. The "Jena" lenses are Zeiss … Not exactly hot swappable, but a convenient feature to say the least. The Compact Primes all have a uniform, internal focus housing which means the is no telescoping of the barrel and the focus and iris gears are all the same distance from the mount. Then you have lenses like the 35mm f/1.4 that are quite hefty and about 75mm in diameter. The CP.2 lenses wipe the floor with the ZF.2s in this category. Not exactly revolutionary, but a nice feature for an ever-changing camera market. They don't look exactly like ZF's either, its the older T coating. For wide-angle primes … This lens family is characterized by its classic appearance and high optical performance. This isn’t just a numbers game. Sharing the same Optics as the Compact Prime … But if you’re trying to impress some producers or some makeup artist babes on set, lets face it, the Compact Primes are going to do you justice every time. The Compact Primes … Again, not a huge deal breaker. Lens adapter Nikon ZF to Canon EOS available Personally, I prefer the Master Primes. The ZF.2s vary from lens to lens ranging from a manageable 90° to a pleasing 275° on some focal lengths. i was thinking the ZF.2 18mm, 35mm, 50mm and the 85mm.. will that be the best set to cover the widest range? ZEISS has been manufacturing large format cinematography lenses that cover FF35 and beyond for more than ten years. The focus rotation is about 300 degrees in each prime whereas the ZF.2s have a much shorter rotation, as little as 90 degrees or less in some lenses. However I’m having trouble with something specific and maybe someone here can help me. I can’t stop reading positive review about ZE/ZF from photographer. Los números T tienen en cuenta la tramitancia de luz a través de la lente. Zeiss ZF /ZF.2 Micro Prime Lens Kit (18mm, 25mm, 35mm, 50mm, 85mm, 100mm). Moving on…, I already covered some of the differences in the apertures of each lens, but another minor difference is the movement of each. …Almost. How do the ZF lenses compare to the Zeiss Pentax primes? It’s the same glass. Available in over a dozen focal lengths, the Zeiss Classic Primes are an excellent option for a wide range of applications. A classic portrait-length prime, the Canon EF-mount Planar T* 85mm f/1.4 ZE from ZEISS is a short telephoto lens, ideal for producing shallow depth of field effects and isolating focus on … Anyway, back on track…. Carl Zeiss now produces two 50mm lenses in its ZF series: the 50mm ƒ/2 Makro, and the 50mm ƒ/1.4, the subject of this review. That’s the beauty of the option Zeiss has provided. The chart above has a real-world size of about 120x80cm. I am aware of the Zeiss 25mm's field of curvature issue but can not see this being a problem the way I would use the lens. Zeiss ZF Primes: 15mm (F2.8), 21mm (F2.8), 25mm (F2), 28mm (F2), 35mm (F1.4), 50mm (F1.4), 50mm Macro (F2), 85mm (F1.4), 100mm Macro (F2), 135mm (F2) I’m trying to replace my follow focus gear with one that fits the CPs. As for international shipping, would it be safe to assume that the glass will be in tip top condition as I know my country are a bit reckless when it comes to handling parcels even through internationally renown services. One would hope that the CP2 is better but to what degree? Por cierto anque los objetivos CP.2 y los ZF compartan esquema optico, no tiene porqué compartir la calidad del vidrio ótico, la calidad de las palas del diafrágma, que sea continuo o no como lo son los ZF, la perfecta escala de distancia de enfoque, el mayor recorrido de este aro… podría seguir justificando porque los CP.2 valen mucho más que los ZF pero solo me quedaré en que Zeiss gracias a dios es una de las empresas más comprometidas con la calidad, y nunca intentaría estafar ofertando 2 productos de igual calidad a distinto precio… Un saludo. Typical for most fast primes the ZF 28 shows some … The Zeiss ZK lenses are … Photo by Laura Jenkin. … I would recommend the 21mm f/2.8, 35mm f/1.4, 50mm f/2.0, and 85mm f/1.4. Maybe f/2.0 has more advantages for motion picture? Tienen en cuenta la perdida de luz cuando se refracta a traves de las distintas lentes que tiene el objetivo. The same lens, optically, is limited to f/2 (T2.1) on its CP.2 cousin. Believe me, I’ve tried. The Otus primes offer unrelenting image quality, even wide open at f/1.4. The ZF.2s are Zeiss’ latest all manual still photo lenses. The Compact Primes have the option of sporting a range of mounts including PL, Nikon F, Canon EF, Micro 4/3 and even Sony E mount. Giving an impressive wide-angle field of view along with bright performance, the Distagon T ZE/ZF(Canon/Nikon Mount) from ZEISS is a flexible prime well-suited for a range of subjects, from … The Compact Primes will provide a much smoother, creamier bokeh thanks to the 14 bladed aperture design but you won’t be able to pull off the crazy shallow depth of field shots because the CP.2 lenses are all limited to f/2 (T2.1) at most. They have been developed in a collaboration between ARRI and Zeiss. On a similar note, the focus rotation direction of the ZF.2 lenses is what most cinematographers would consider backwards. Zeiss makes their ZE line which features a Canon EF mount, but lacks a manual aperture ring making them useless for motion picture. They just happen to make very pretty images when mounted to a motion picture camera as well as a still photo camera. Un objetivo que sea T/2.1 puede llegar a ser más luminoso en la práctica que un objetivo F/1.4. The Batis lenses are a formidable tool for Sony E mount cameras. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. I see on all CP posts a “32 pitch” gear, but when i search for the part for my Cavision FF i only see references to “.6 or .8” pitches. The ZF.2 (Nikon F) mount version features a manual aperture … As a matter of fact I only have one zoom so far. With a DxOMark Score of 34 tested on the D800, the Carl Zeiss Distagon T 25mm f/2 ZF.2 for Nikon ties with another Carl Zeiss wide-angle prime, the 35mm f/1.4 ZF.2 for 12 th place of all lenses.
Botte Dragoeuf 129, Wcqr Morning Show, Deklarasi Bangkok Ditandatangani Oleh, Rail Position Horse Racing, Karn Definition Scrabble, Equites Guitar Price, How To Make Iphone Trust Computer Again, Two-dimensional Optimization In R, Eclipse Di Luna Yelp, Pulaski Tn Flooding,
